TRAKR®SOLUTIONS
TRAKR® AIoT Based Asset Monitoring

TRADITIONAL WAYS OF ASSET TRACKING

PEN AND PAPER SPREADSHEET BARCODE
In the past, businesses would keep logbooks of their assets – establishing when something was signed out, into whose custody it was released, and when it could be expected back (if applicable). With the advent of computers, spreadsheets and databases replaced paper ledgers, but it still required a human to physically count the items and enter them into the system It’s hard to look around these days and not see a barcode. The fact that this piece of passive technology – first used commercially in the 1970s – is still so ubiquitous today is a testament to its versatility.
RANGE
ACCURACY
PROS
CONS
QR Code
1-5m
LoS
  • Very low cost
  • No Battery
  • Dirt causes issue
  • Line of sight is needed
RFID
1-10m
LoS
  • Low cost
  • No Battery
  • Range is less
  • Line of sight is needed
BLE
100m
15m
  • Low power consumption
  • Easy to use
  • Battery operated
  • High cost / sq m
UWB
25m
.3m
  • High Accuracy
  • Resilient to interference
  • Shorter range
  • Highest cost /sq m
LORA
10000m
with GPS, 1m
  • High range
  • Transmission is free
  • Expensive tags
  • High battery usage

METHODOLOGY INDOOR POSITION SYSTEM

IPS system is at the core of our tracking solution.

  • A tracking unit (TRAKR) is mounted on the MHE
  • The TRAKR is tracked using Anchor nodes installed in the premises
  • The tracked location from the anchor nodes is transmitted to a cloud or on premise server
  • The server logs the location and uses the information to track the location of the asset
  • The asset in this solution is identified using QR code by the trakr-cam mounted on the MHE
  • We can achieve an accuracy of less than 1 m

TRAKR® AIoT Based Asset Monitoring

Request for quote
AIoT Based Asset Monitoring

Data Points- Selection